tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36235418.post7200681752219096694..comments2022-11-14T06:40:41.662-08:00Comments on Tractatus Blogico-Philosophicus: DRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08332954000692559637noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36235418.post-28024675579173634032007-09-03T05:49:00.000-07:002007-09-03T05:49:00.000-07:00Good point. I wouldn't want to assume that "think...Good point. I wouldn't want to assume that "thinking" is the only way we can grasp reality.<BR/><BR/>On the other hand, when I see that "Moore" is left of "good" I can also say that this is the case. And I can think it. Sense seems to be bound up with thinking, so that a non-thinking grasp of something would not make sense of that something. Perhaps that doesn't matter.DRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08332954000692559637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36235418.post-45016590262023394212007-08-31T14:47:00.000-07:002007-08-31T14:47:00.000-07:00Must "thinking" be the only mode in which we grasp...Must "thinking" be the only mode in which we grasp reality? Wittgenstein says that we "see" the logical form of a proposition, just as we see that "Moore" is to the left of "good" in "Moore good."N. N.https://www.blogger.com/profile/05983492370711591794noreply@blogger.com